Will this still be maintained a year from now? And how will the ever increasing complexity of feature requests affect the project? On the other hand, there’s the critical perspective: If I’d consider using it for a large project for a client, every piece of information that makes me feel more relaxed about all the possible issues (support, roadmap, LTS, etc) would certainly be positive. That’s what makes me stick around here in the first place! I’m honestly in awe when I see how much time and effort Razvan already invested. And reaching this point, things get exponentially more complicated. But the growth and obligations to fulfill people’s wishes that come with it would inevitably pose a scaling issue at some point, without considering turning it into a business case, like Ionic did. More buzz would be great, more patreon backers too. It comes down to simple economics (at least from my very remote perspective).
#Using ghostlab as scss preprocessor full
And I’m not sure if that’s what he wants while not being able to work on it full time. This sounds like a win-win to me for everyone involved. It’s sort of common sense thing to do, but maybe making it a clear objective/ expectation of being a supporter through Patreon could be a good thing? I am not sure it is a standard policy, but I know he does this. Razvan will attack bugs from Patreon donors at a higher priority. Or maybe you can offer a patreon backer something substantial that the drive-by consumer doesn’t have access to.
0 kommentar(er)
